How Pulse For Good’s Survey Kiosks Save Hours of Work for Organizations

Blake Kohler

Manual surveys involve time-consuming steps like administration, data entry, cleaning, and analysis, often leading to errors and delays. Automated kiosks streamline this process, providing real-time data capture, reducing human errors, and enabling instant analysis.

In today’s world, feedback is a vital component for organizations, especially those serving vulnerable populations. Collecting and analyzing feedback can help improve services, measure success, and understand needs. However, the traditional survey administration process is time-consuming and requires a lot of manual work. That’s where automated survey solutions, like Pulse For Good’s kiosks, come into play. By streamlining the entire data collection process, these systems not only save significant time but also improve the accuracy and quality of data collected.

This blog post delves into the nitty-gritty of how much time is actually saved when organizations switch from traditional, manual survey collection methods to automated survey kiosks, illustrating the impact on staff workload, data quality, and analysis capabilities.

The Manual Survey Process: Where Does the Time Go?

When organizations use traditional methods like paper-based surveys or in-person interviews, the entire process becomes multi-step, labor-intensive, and susceptible to various forms of human error. Here’s a breakdown of what manual survey administration typically looks like:

  1. Survey Administration: The first and most obvious step is administering the survey itself. For a 10-minute survey conducted on paper or verbally, this step alone consumes 10 minutes of an organization's time per participant. This time can increase if there are follow-up questions or clarifications needed during the survey.
  2. Data Entry: After collecting the responses, staff need to manually input the survey data into a computer system. For a survey with 10-20 questions, data entry can take an additional 2-5 minutes per survey. Multiply this by dozens or hundreds of surveys, and you quickly see how this becomes a significant burden on staff time. This step is not just time-consuming—it is also where errors can easily slip in due to fatigue or oversight​(Sapien
  3. Data Cleaning: Once the data is entered, staff must then review it for errors, inconsistencies, and missing entries. This data cleaning process typically adds 1-2 minutes per survey. Though it may not seem like much on a per-survey basis, this time accumulates rapidly with larger data sets.
  4. Preliminary Data Analysis: Next, the data needs to be analyzed. For basic analyses, such as calculating averages or generating simple charts, staff can expect to spend an additional 5-10 minutes per survey batch. More complex analyses, such as cross-tabulations or trend identification, could easily add another 10-20 minutes per survey batch, depending on the complexity of the survey questions and the desired level of insight​(World Bank Blogs)
  5. Report Preparation: Once the initial analysis is complete, organizations often need to create reports summarizing the survey findings. The time needed for this step varies but can take anywhere from 30 minutes to several hours, depending on the depth of analysis and the number of surveys.

In summary, for each individual survey, organizations could easily spend 15-17 minutes just on administration and data entry, with additional time required for evaluations and report preparation. If the organization collects responses from, say, 100 individuals in a week, the total time required for administration, entry, and initial analysis could range from 25 to 30 hours. And that’s before even considering the preparation of comprehensive reports!

The Drawbacks of Manual Data Collection

The sheer amount of time it takes to collect and process data manually isn’t the only issue. The process itself is fraught with challenges:

  1. Human Error and Data Reliability: Manual data entry is prone to transcription errors, omissions, and inconsistencies. Even the most diligent data entry clerk can make mistakes, especially when dealing with large volumes of surveys​(Mapex) Such errors can lead to unreliable data, which, in turn, affects decision-making.
  2. Delayed Analysis: Due to the time required for data entry and cleaning, organizations using manual surveys may not have real-time access to feedback. Delays in data availability hinder timely decision-making, which can negatively impact an organization’s ability to respond to immediate needs or changes.
  3. Lack of Advanced Data Analysis: Manually collected data often ends up in unstructured formats or in separate spreadsheets. This fragmentation makes it harder to perform more advanced analyses, such as identifying patterns or trends. These “islands of information” limit the organization's ability to make data-driven improvements​(Mapex).
  4. Regulatory Compliance and Traceability Issues: Keeping track of compliance-related data becomes increasingly difficult when relying on paper surveys or manual entry. Should quality issues or complaints arise, tracing data back to its source can become a complex and nearly impossible process, impacting the organization’s reputation and relationships with its clients and stakeholders.

The Automated Solution: How Survey Kiosks Save Time and Improve Quality

Enter automated survey kiosks like those offered by Pulse For Good. These systems are designed to address the inefficiencies and errors inherent in manual survey processes, allowing organizations to collect high-quality data without the manual workload.

  1. Instant Data Capture: With automated survey kiosks, responses are captured in real-time, eliminating the need for manual data entry. This instantly saves the 2-5 minutes per survey typically required for data entry, as well as the additional time needed for data cleaning and verification. Since the responses are recorded directly into the system, the risk of transcription errors is eliminated​(Sapien).
  2. Real-Time Data Processing: Automated systems not only capture data but also allow for immediate data processing and analysis. For instance, Pulse For Good’s kiosks come equipped with built-in tools for preliminary data analysis, providing insights as soon as responses are submitted. This feature can reduce the time needed for initial analysis by up to 10 minutes per survey batch​(Mapex).
  3. Advanced Analysis Capabilities: Automated platforms are capable of advanced data analysis, such as cross-tabulation, trend identification, and even randomized question orders to avoid bias. These capabilities allow organizations to extract more meaningful insights without requiring additional manual processing. According to the World Bank, electronic data collection systems offer built-in constraints to ensure respondents are asked the right questions, improving both the quality and relevance of data collected​(World Bank Blogs).
  4. Automatic Error Prevention: By using electronic survey kiosks, organizations can prevent many of the common errors associated with manual data collection. For example, kiosks can incorporate built-in constraints that restrict the range of possible responses, ensuring that data is consistent and usable from the start​(World Bank Blogs).
  5. Enhanced Flexibility: Automated survey systems offer the ability to modify surveys on the fly. If you discover mid-way through a survey cycle that a question needs to be rephrased for clarity or cultural relevance, automated platforms like kiosks allow you to make these changes instantly without the logistics of reprinting paper surveys​(World Bank Blogs).
  6. Improved Security and Confidentiality: Kiosk systems can isolate sensitive questions for self-administration, reducing the risk of bias or privacy violations. This feature is especially important for organizations collecting feedback on sensitive topics, as it helps protect respondents and ensures more honest answers​(World Bank Blogs).

The Total Time Savings: A Real-World Perspective

By automating survey collection and analysis through kiosks, organizations can potentially save 12-15 minutes per survey, simply by removing the need for data entry, data cleaning, and basic evaluations. The only remaining time investment is the 10 minutes it takes participants to complete the survey itself.

For organizations that collect a large volume of surveys, the cumulative time savings are significant. For example, if an organization administers 100 surveys in a week using manual methods, they could spend upwards of 25-30 hours processing these surveys. Switching to an automated kiosk system could cut this time down to approximately 10 hours or less, representing a 60% reduction in workload!

Beyond Time Savings: The Added Benefits of Automation

While the time savings alone are a compelling reason to switch to automated survey systems, the benefits don’t stop there:

  1. Data Accuracy and Reliability: Automated systems significantly reduce the potential for human error, resulting in more accurate and reliable data. This, in turn, enables organizations to make better-informed decisions​(Mapex).
  2. Real-Time Insights: Since data is captured and processed instantaneously, organizations have immediate access to feedback. This allows them to respond to issues and trends as they arise, improving overall service quality and effectiveness​(Sapien).
  3. Compliance and Traceability: Automated systems offer better traceability, making it easier to comply with industry regulations and standards. When quality issues or complaints arise, organizations can quickly access the necessary data, safeguarding their reputation and client relationships​(Mapex).
  4. Flexible and Scalable Data Collection: Automated kiosks make it easy to scale up data collection efforts as needed. Unlike manual methods, which require additional staff and resources, kiosks can handle increased survey volumes without added personnel, providing a more cost-effective solution in the long run​(Sapien).

Conclusion: Making the Switch to Automated Survey Systems

Switching to Pulse For Good’s kiosk-based survey system can save organizations a substantial amount of time and resources. By reducing the time spent on data entry, cleaning, and analysis, organizations can redirect their efforts towards what truly matters—using the feedback to make meaningful changes and improvements in their services. Additionally, automated surveys improve data accuracy, provide real-time insights, and offer greater flexibility and scalability.

Ready to save time and improve the quality of your data collection process? Contact us at Pulse For Good to learn how our survey kiosks can revolutionize the way you collect feedback and serve your community more effectively.

More Articles You Might Enjoy

Didn’t find what you’re looking for?